Rightfully Teachers

There are two points we need to consider. one is that whatever information we have about the letter MHRD has sent to the University (and which apparently does not have the approval of the visitor) does in no way indicates that the ordinance passed by the BOM (After taking into account the approvals of academic council, finance committee) has any defeciencies is its premise that we are teachers. There is no argument to refute this fact. The letter only states that ordinance may not be implemented because if its financial and other implications. (By the way, the financial implication have already been cosidered and accepted by finance committee). Other implications have not been spelled out. Even so, if it is accepted that we are teachers as per our recruitment process, we should not be denied our rights because of some implications. Implications of any should be dealt with in a manner so that a whole community of teachers does not suffer.The second point is that the MHRD has apparently not found any thing in the concered ordinance which is in any way in contravention of IGNOU act or its statues. If so there should be no reason not to implement it and deny basic and well deserved rights to a major section of employeees who have been suffering for almost two decades. A demoralised and frustrated work force can not be very productive for any organisation.